月別アーカイブ: 2009年9月

「nathalieの日記」おすすめブログ

おすすめブログを紹介します!
nathalieさんが書いている
nathalieの日記
プロフィールから抜粋
===
こんにちは。ナタリーと申します日本が大好きなLYON出身のフランス人です。
日本での暮らし、全て合わせて、そろそろ12年になります。
19年間、パリや日本のさまざまなエルメス ブチックに勤務し、昨年の12月に退社しスカーフの結び方の本を出版致しました.
その後、独立し、今まで習ったことを生かして、フランス語教師やカラリスト(カラーセラピーやパーソナルカラー)やスカーフコーデイネータなどとして活用中です。
皆様との意見交換などをとても楽しみにしております。これから、皆様のお付き合いをよろしくお願い致します
===
ナタリーさんは日本が大好きで、長年にわたり日本で暮らしているフランス人の方です。
そのナタリーさんが、外国人から見た日本の日常生活や出来事を語っているブログです。
私もずっと以前にヨーロッパに仕事で駐在していたことがありますので(なるほど、そういえばそう!)
と共感できるところがあります。そして自分が忘れてしまった「当たり前」の感覚を思い出します。
例えば最近の記事で言えば「女性が下着が見える服装や姿勢」について述べていらっしゃいます。
これなど日本vs外国ではなく、我々日本人が本来普通に身につけていた身だしなみだと思います。
その論調は日本批判ではなく、飽くまでも日本を愛するが故の驚きや感動などを述べていらっしゃいます。
…と言って、決して固いブログではありませんよ音譜
料理教室もしていらして、フランスのお菓子とか写真もたくさんあって楽しい気分になりますニコニコ
生まれ故郷のフランスのリヨンの写真もあって(あぁ、ヨーロッパだなぁ)と旅行気分に浸ることもできます飛行機
みなさん、ナタリーさんのブログを是非ご訪問なさってみてくださいね(-^□^-)
☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚* ☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*
クリックを宜しくお願いします右矢印にほんブログ村 英語ブログ 英語表現・口語表現へ 人気ブログランキングへ
著書「よっちゃんのやさしい英語レッスン」(ピープレス出版)が10月10日に発売されます!
ネット:アマゾンで購入できます⇒アマゾン
書店: ISBN番号「978-4434137255」でご予約ください。
このブログの読者登録は大歓迎です⇒読者登録

「文法の基礎」シリーズの連載を始めます

語源シリーズはいかがだったでしょうか。
英語力=単語力です。毎日の単語の学習の際に語源の知識がきっと生きてくるはずです。
そして長文を読むときにも「意味を推測」する助けになりますので繰り返し復習してくださいね。
語源シリーズの目次はここをクリック
さて!明日からは新シリーズ「文法の基礎」です。
ここでは私の英語の捉え方についての基本を述べていきます。
英語が苦手な方にもできるだけ理解しやすいように書いていきますので、どうぞお楽しみに!
☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚* ☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*
クリックを宜しくお願いします右矢印にほんブログ村 英語ブログ 英語表現・口語表現へ 人気ブログランキングへ
著書「よっちゃんのやさしい英語レッスン」が10月10日に発売されます!
ネット:アマゾンで購入できます⇒アマゾン
書店: ISBN番号「978-4434137255」でご予約ください。
このブログの読者登録は大歓迎です⇒読者登録

パレスチナ和平交渉の再開問題;アメリカ・イスラエル・パレスチナの三者会談


他のニュース記事の目次
オバマ大統領はネタニヤフ・イスラエル首相、アッバス・パレスチナ自治政府議長との3者会談を行いました。これまでオバマ大統領はイスラエルに入植活動の全面凍結を求めてきましたが、一部容認するのではないかという推測があり、会談では何も進展が得られませんでした。
パレスチナはアメリカがイスラエルに圧力をかけることを前提に、同国が全面凍結に応じない限り交渉再開には応じないとの姿勢を堅持してきました。ミッチェル米特使は来週にもイスラエル・パレスチナ双方を訪問して実務レベルの協議を行うようですが、現状打開には大きな壁がそびえているようです。
I have just concluded frank and productive bilateral meetings with both Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas. And I want to thank them both for appearing here today. I am now looking forward to this opportunity to hold the first meeting among the three of us since we took office.
As I said throughout my campaign and at the beginning of my administration, the United States is committed to a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the Middle East. That includes a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that results in two states, Israel and Palestine, in which both the Israeli people and the Palestinian people can live in peace and security and realize their aspirations for a better life for their children.
That is why my Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and my Special Envoy George Mitchell have worked tirelessly to create the context for permanent status negotiations. And we have made progress since I took office in January and since Israelis — Israel’s government took office in April. But we still have much further to go.
Palestinians have strengthened their efforts on security, but they need to do more to stop incitement and to move forward with negotiations. Israelis have facilitated greater freedom of movement for the Palestinians and have discussed important steps to restrain settlement activity. But they need to translate these discussions into real action on this and other issues. And it remains important for the Arab states to take concrete steps to promote peace.
Simply put it is past time to talk about starting negotiations — it is time to move forward. It is time to show the flexibility and common sense and sense of compromise that’s necessary to achieve our goals. Permanent status negotiations must begin and begin soon. And more importantly, we must give those negotiations the opportunity to succeed.
And so my message to these two leaders is clear. Despite all the obstacles, despite all the history, despite all the mistrust, we have to find a way forward. We have to summon the will to break the deadlock that has trapped generations of Israelis and Palestinians in an endless cycle of conflict and suffering. We cannot continue the same pattern of taking tentative steps forward and then stepping back. Success depends on all sides acting with a sense of urgency. And that is why I have asked Secretary Clinton and Senator Mitchell to carry forward the work that we do here today.
Senator Mitchell will meet with the Israeli and Palestinian negotiators next week. I’ve asked the Prime Minister and the President to continue these intensive discussions by sending their teams back to Washington next week. And I’ve asked the Secretary of State to report to me on the status of these negotiations in mid-October.
All of us know this will not be easy. But we are here today because it is the right thing to do. I look forward to speaking with my colleagues. I’m committed to pressing ahead in the weeks and months and years to come, because it is absolutely critical that we get this issue resolved. It’s not just critical for the Israelis and the Palestinians, it’s critical for the world, it is in the interests of the United State. And we are going to work as hard as necessary to accomplish our goals. Thanks.
☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚* ☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*
クリックを宜しくお願いします右矢印にほんブログ村 英語ブログ 英語表現・口語表現へ 人気ブログランキングへ
著書「よっちゃんのやさしい英語レッスン」(ピープレス出版)が10月10日に発売されます!
ネット:アマゾンで購入できます⇒アマゾン
書店: ISBN番号「978-4434137255」でご予約ください。
このブログの読者登録は大歓迎です⇒読者登録

日米首脳会談 / アメリカ側の対応とメディアの扱い


過去のニュース記事(オバマ大統領演説)はここをクリック
G20金融サミットの機会を利用してオバマ大統領と鳩山首相との会談が行われました。日米摩擦の元となりかねない話題について言及されなかったことへの批判がありますが、外交としては双方にとって当然の対処ではないでしょうか。
それよりも着目したいことがあります。この会談の模様はホワイトハウスのユーチューブの公式サイトにはアップされてはいません。イスラエル&パレスチナ首脳との会談に比べればインパクトが小さいことは明らかであるにしても、従来からアメリカメディアでの日本の扱いは非常に小さいものであることを覚えておく必要があると思います。
今回の会談は飽くまでも今後長期の(両国共に4年間継続すると思われる)友好・協力関係を確認したということで十分ではないでしょうか。それより寧ろオバマ大統領の11月の来日までにいかに日本の政権内の政策調整を行って具体的提案をアメリカにぶつけるか、ということが焦点であると思います。
アメリカでは新政権発足後の100日間はハネムーン期間と呼び、メディアも辛らつな攻撃はしないと言います。オバマ大統領もこう述べています。
I know how it feels to have just been elected and form a government and suddenly you have to appear at a range of international summits; I went through this nine months ago.
(首班指名されて新政府を構築した直後に多様な国際会議に出席するという状況がどのようなものであるか、自分も9ヶ月前に同様のことを経験しただけによくわかります)
また大統領は「民主党の政権公約はきっと達成されるだろう」と以下のように述べていますが、私はこれは欧米流のリップサービスのように感じます。寧ろ後半に述べた「今後の日米同盟の更なる強化」こちらに重きがあると思います
But I’m very confident that not only will the Prime Minister succeed in his efforts and his campaign commitments, but that this will give us an opportunity to strengthen and renew a U.S.-Japan alliance that will be as strong in the 21st century as it was in the latter half of the 20th century.
(しかし私は鳩山首相が公約達成に成功するばかりでなく、そのことが日米同盟の強化につながり、それは20世紀後半と同様に今後21世紀においても強固なものであることを確信しています)
I want to welcome the new Prime Minister of Japan, Prime Minister Hatoyama. I want to congratulate him for running an extraordinary campaign and his party leading dramatic change in Japan. We had a very good preliminary discussion about the critical importance of the U.S.-Japanese alliance. It has been a cornerstone of the security of both nations as well as the economic prosperity of both nations for almost 50 years.
And we pledged that we wanted to strengthen and deepen that relationship. As the world’s two largest economies we recognize the importance of coordinating closely to continue to move beyond the current economic crisis and to focus our attention on how our economies are actually providing opportunity for ordinary citizens. And we also pledged to coordinate very closely together on a range of international threats — everything from nuclear proliferation, the situation in North Korea, how we can help to stabilize Afghanistan and Pakistan, and how we address transnational issues like climate change.
So I’ve been very impressed with the knowledge and determination of Prime Minister Hatoyama. I know how it feels to have just been elected and form a government and suddenly you have to appear at a range of international summits; I went through this nine months ago. But I’m very confident that not only will the Prime Minister succeed in his efforts and his campaign commitments, but that this will give us an opportunity to strengthen and renew a U.S.-Japan alliance that will be as strong in the 21st century as it was in the latter half of the 20th century.
☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚* ☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*
クリックを宜しくお願いします右矢印にほんブログ村 英語ブログ 英語表現・口語表現へ 人気ブログランキングへ
よっちゃんのやさしい英語レッスン」(ピープレス出版)が10月10日に発売されます!
ネット:アマゾンで購入できます⇒アマゾン
書店: ISBN番号「978-4434137255」でご予約ください。
このブログの読者登録は大歓迎です⇒読者登録

Progress in the Global Economy世界経済の進捗状況/オバマ大統領


来週はアメリカのピッツバーグでG20金融サミットが開催されます。「リーマン・ショック」からおよそ1年、各国による財政政策、金融政策のおかげで、事態は鎮静化に向かっています。オバマ大統領は「根本的な問題解決には金融のルールを厳しくすべき」と延べ、金融機関の監督強化や法整備を進めています。
前回のG20会議は4月に開催され、今回は5ヶ月たった経過と現状認識の意味を持ちます。またアメリカにおいては金融機関トップの巨額ボーナス支給が復活されつつあることへの不快感も表明しています。
現状は経済危機の出血を止めただけの状態に過ぎず、今後の発展を確固たるものにするために更に世界共通のルールを作り上げ、1年前と同様の危機が今後生じないようにすることが重要であると強調しています。
またアメリカにおいての改革にはConsumer Financial Protection Agency(金融消費者保護庁)が中心的役割として存在しクレジットカード会社などとの不当な契約から消費者を保護することが期待されています。
ウオールストリートの巨大銀行のロビーストは現状のシステム維持に向けて暗躍し、政治力を駆使しようとしているが、特定利益集団のために改革に抵抗しようとする勢力とは徹底的に闘うという姿勢を表明しています。
Leaders of the world’s largest economies will gather next week in Pittsburgh for the second time this year. The first meeting of the G-20 nations in April came at the height of the global financial crisis 窶骭€ a crisis that required unprecedented international cooperation to jumpstart the world’s economies and help break the downward spiral that enveloped all our nations.
At next week’s summit, we’ll have, in effect, a five-month checkup to review the steps each nation has taken 窶骭€ separately and together 窶骭€ to break the back of this economic crisis. And the good news is that we’ve made real progress since last time we met 窶骭€ here at home and around the world.
In February, we enacted a Recovery Act, providing relief to Americans who need it, preventing layoffs, and putting Americans back to work. We’ve worked to unlock frozen credit markets, spurring lending to Americans looking to buy homes or cars, take out student loans, or finance small businesses. And we’ve challenged other nations to join us not only to spur global demand, but to address the underlying problems that caused such a deep global recession in the first place.
Because of the steps taken by our nation and all nations, we can now say that we have stopped our economic freefall. But we also know that stopping the bleeding isn’t nearly enough. Our work is far from over. We know we still have a lot to do here at home to build an economy that is producing good jobs for all those who are looking for work today. And we know we still have a lot to do, in conjunction with nations around the world, to strengthen the rules governing financial markets and ensure that we never again find ourselves in the precarious situation we found ourselves in just one year ago.
As I told leaders of our financial community in New York City earlier this week, a return to normalcy can’t breed complacency. To protect our economy and people from another market meltdown, our government needs to fundamentally reform the rules governing financial firms and markets to meet the challenges of the 21st century. We cannot allow the thirst for reckless schemes that produce quick profits and fat executive bonuses to override the security of our entire financial system and leave taxpayers on the hook for cleaning up the mess. And as the world’s largest economy, we must lead, not just by word, but by example, understanding that in the 21st century, financial crises know no borders. All of us need to act more responsibly on behalf of a better economic future.
That is why, at next week’s G20 summit, we’ll discuss some of the steps that are required to safeguard our global financial system and close gaps in regulation around the world 窶骭€ gaps that permitted the kinds of reckless risk-taking and irresponsibility that led to the crisis. And that’s why I’ve called on Congress to put in place a series of tough, common-sense rules of the road that will protect consumers from abuse, let markets function fairly and freely, and help prevent a crisis like this from ever happening again.
Central to these reforms is a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency. Part of what led to this crisis were not just decisions made on Wall Street, but also unsustainable mortgage loans made across the country. While many folks took on more than they knew they could afford, too often folks signed contracts they didn’t fully understand offered by lenders who didn’t always tell the truth. That’s why we need clear rules, clearly enforced. And that’s what this agency will do.
Consumers shouldn’t have to worry about loan contracts written to confuse, hidden fees attached to their mortgages, and financial penalties 窶骭€ whether through a credit card or debit card 窶骭€ that appear without a clear warning on their statements. And responsible lenders, including community banks, trying to do the right thing shouldn’t have to worry about ruinous competition from unregulated and unscrupulous competitors.
Not surprisingly, lobbyists for big Wall Street banks are hard at work trying to stop reforms that would hold them accountable and they want to keep things just the way they are. But we cannot let politics as usual triumph so business as usual can reign. We cannot let the narrow interests of a few come before the interests of all of us. We cannot forget how close we came to the brink, and perpetuate the broken system and breakdown of responsibility that made it possible.
In the weeks and months ahead, we have an opportunity to build on the work we’ve already done. An opportunity to rebuild our global economy stronger that before. An opportunity not only to protect the American people and America’s economy, but to promote sustained and balanced growth and prosperity for our nation and all nations. And that’s an opportunity I am determined to seize.
So, thanks for listening and thanks for watching, and to our Jewish friends, who are celebrating Rosh Hashanah, have a happy and healthy New Year. Shanah Tovah.

MD(Missile Defense) in Europe欧州ミサイル防衛計画/オバマ大統領


オバマ米大統領はブッシュ前政権がポーランドやチェコで進めていたミサイル防衛(MD)システム配備計画の見直しを正式発表しました。
オバマ大統領は「欧州の新たなミサイル防衛体制により、ブッシュ前大統領が提案していたプログラムよりも強固な防衛システムが間もなく提供される」と説明し、現時点で最も差し迫った脅威はイランの短・中距離弾道ミサイルであり、その脅威に対抗するためには、この新しい弾道ミサイル防衛の方がふさわしいと指摘しました。
MD計画についてはロシアが自国のミサイル防衛網を無力化するとして強硬に反対していました。しかしオバマ大統領の声明を受け、ロシアは短距離ミサイル配備などMDへの軍事的な対抗措置を凍結することを決めたとも言われています。
また米国はロシアに対し、MD配備中止と引き換えに防空システムS300のイランへの供与を中止し、国連安保理で厳しいイラン制裁決議を支持するよう求めているともいいます。
===
外交的戦略が渦巻いているわけですが、少なくともかつてのような核軍事力の拡大競争や米露2大国のたいりるを深める方向ではなく、縮小そして建設的な話し合いに舵をきろうとしている動きは心強く感じられます。
Good morning. As Commander-in-Chief, I’m committed to doing everything in my power to advance our national security. And that includes strengthening our defenses against any and all threats to our people, our troops, and our friends and allies around the world.
One of those threats is the danger posed by ballistic missiles. As I said during the campaign, President Bush was right that Iran’s ballistic missile program poses a significant threat. And that’s why I’m committed to deploying strong missile defense systems which are adaptable to the threats of the 21st century.
The best way to responsibly advance our security and the security of our allies is to deploy a missile defense system that best responds to the threats that we face and that utilizes technology that is both proven and cost-effective.
In keeping with that commitment, and a congressionally mandated review, I ordered a comprehensive assessment of our missile defense program in Europe. And after an extensive process, I have approved the unanimous recommendations of my Secretary of Defense and my Joint Chiefs of Staff to strengthen America’s defenses against ballistic missile attack.
This new approach will provide capabilities sooner, build on proven systems, and offer greater defenses against the threat of missile attack than the 2007 European missile defense program.
This decision was guided by two principal factors. First, we have updated our intelligence assessment of Iran’s missile programs, which emphasizes the threat posed by Iran’s short- and medium-range missiles, which are capable of reaching Europe. There’s no substitute for Iran complying with its international obligations regarding its nuclear program, and we, along with our allies and partners, will continue to pursue strong diplomacy to ensure that Iran lives up to these international obligations. But this new ballistic missile defense program will best address the threat posed by Iran’s ongoing ballistic missile defense program.
Second, we have made specific and proven advances in our missile defense technology, particularly with regard to land- and sea-based interceptors and the sensors that support them. Our new approach will, therefore, deploy technologies that are proven and cost-effective and that counter the current threat, and do so sooner than the previous program. Because our approach will be phased and adaptive, we will retain the flexibility to adjust and enhance our defenses as the threat and technology continue to evolve.
To put it simply, our new missile defense architecture in Europe will provide stronger, smarter, and swifter defenses of American forces and America’s allies. It is more comprehensive than the previous program; it deploys capabilities that are proven and cost-effective; and it sustains and builds upon our commitment to protect the U.S. homeland against long-range ballistic missile threats; and it ensures and enhances the protection of all our NATO allies.
This approach is also consistent with NATO missile — NATO’s missile defense efforts and provides opportunities for enhanced international collaboration going forward. We will continue to work cooperatively with our close friends and allies, the Czech Republic and Poland, who had agreed to host elements of the previous program. I’ve spoken to the Prime Ministers of both the Czech Republic and Poland about this decision and reaffirmed our deep and close ties. Together we are committed to a broad range of cooperative efforts to strengthen our collective defense, and we are bound by the solemn commitment of NATO’s Article V that an attack on one is an attack on all.
We’ve also repeatedly made clear to Russia that its concerns about our previous missile defense programs were entirely unfounded. Our clear and consistent focus has been the threat posed by Iran’s ballistic missile program, and that continues to be our focus and the basis of the program that we’re announcing today.
In confronting that threat, we welcome Russians’ cooperation to bring its missile defense capabilities into a broader defense of our common strategic interests, even as we continue to — we continue our shared efforts to end Iran’s illicit nuclear program.
Going forward, my administration will continue to consult closely with Congress and with our allies as we deploy this system, and we will rigorously evaluate both the threat posed by ballistic missiles and the technology that we are developing to counter it.
I’m confident that with the steps we’ve taken today, we have strengthened America’s national security and enhanced our capacity to confront 21st century threats.
Thank you very much, everybody.

Size of government 小さい政府と大きい政府(医療制度改革)

国民皆保険の方向を模索するオバマ大統領。殆ど全てを民間に任せていた状態に比べれば公的保険の拡大は「大きい政府」になると思われます。アメリカの個人主義がそれにアレルギーを持つのも障壁の一つでしょう。
例えば我々は食堂で「定食」に慣れていますし、そういうセットメニューを好みます。しかし例えば会社の社員食堂で単なる「ハンバーグ」を頼むのにも何を入れるのか一々好みを言わなければならず、我々日本人にとってはそれは面倒なことに思えるのですが、個人主義のアメリカではそれが良いサービスになります。
演説の中で象徴的に述べている部分を見てみましょう。
One of the unique and wonderful things about America has always been our self-reliance, our rugged individualism, our fierce defense of freedom and our healthy skepticism of government. And figuring out the appropriate size and role of government has always been a source of rigorous and, yes, sometimes angry debate.
アメリカにおいてユニークで素晴らしい側面は自力本願の精神、確固たる個人主義、自由主義への固執であり、政府に対しての健全なる懐疑主義です。そして「政府の適切な大きさと役割」を推し量ろうとすることは常に活発な、そして時には怒りの感情を伴うほどの議論を惹き起こしてきました。
この後の部分についてはまた改めて述べることにしましょう。
大統領演説の原文はこちら右矢印議会演説で医療保険制度改革遂行を明言、オバマ大統領
☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*
クリックを宜しくお願いします右矢印にほんブログ村 英語ブログ 英語表現・口語表現へ 人気ブログランキングへ

10月10日に著書『よっちゃんのやさしい英語レッスン 』が発売されます!

書店でのご予約はISBN番号「978-4434137255」をお伝えください。

ネットではアマゾンで購入できます右矢印アマゾン

economic crisis経済危機、Great Depression大恐慌、face直面する

オバマ大統領の演説から;
最初の1行からだけでも、たくさん学ぶべき表現がありますね。
When I spoke here last winter, this nation was facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
私が今年の冬に演説した時、アメリカは大恐慌以来の最悪の経済危機に直面していました。
face: もちろん「顔」という名詞もありますが「~に直面する」という動詞でもよく使われますよ。
economic crisis: 経済危機、crisis management=危機管理
Great Depression: 1929年にアメリカで始まった世界大不況
大統領演説の原文はこちら右矢印議会演説で医療保険制度改革遂行を明言、オバマ大統領
☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*☆*゚ ゜゚*
クリックを宜しくお願いします右矢印にほんブログ村 英語ブログ 英語表現・口語表現へ 人気ブログランキングへ

10月10日に著書『よっちゃんのやさしい英語レッスン 』が発売されます!

書店でのご予約はISBN番号「978-4434137255」をお伝えください。

ネットではアマゾンで購入できます右矢印アマゾン

本のポスターを貼ってくださる方を募集いたします

下の写真にあるポスターですがA2サイズのものです。

この「ポスターが貼ってあるところを見たい」という声をあちこちからいただいています。
そこでこのポスターを貼っていただける方を募集させていただきます。

場所は駅が理想ではありますが(一番人目について、また訪問しやすい)有料の場合も多いかと思います。
あ!それからもちろん「書店」に貼っていただけたら申し分ありません!

そうでなくても例えばご近所の「コンビニ」「スーパー」「学校の食堂や掲示板」など、人が立ち寄りやすい場所が助かります。
(でなければ、レストランなどでもかまいません…そこで食事する必要は生じますね(^_^;)

ただ問題は、お送りさせていただくということは住所という個人情報を得てしまうことになりますね。
もちろんそのことを目的としているわけではありません。

そこで、自宅でなくても職場なら送ってもいい、あるいは自宅に送ってもかまわない、という方は私あてにご連絡をいただけませんでしょうか。
アメブロの方はアメブロのメールでお願いします。
そうでない方は以下をクリックして私までメールでご連絡いただけますでしょうか。
メールはここをクリック

全国でポスターを見れたらなぁ、と夢に描いています。
大都市でなくてもかまいません。
どうぞ宜しくお願いします。

$英会話、知っていると便利な一言(成田市の学習塾、ワイズアカデミー)-ポスター2

議会演説で医療保険制度改革遂行を明言、オバマ大統領


オバマ大統領の支持率が落ち込み「50%を割った」とも言いますが、なんと高いレベルにあることでしょう。支持率低下の一因は医療制度改革の議論が進まないことにあるようです。オバマ米大統領は9日、上下両院合同本会議で医療保険改革について演説しました。
医療保険改革をめぐっては、全米各地の対話集会(タウンホールミーティング)が保守派に妨害されたり、民主党と共和党の溝が深まるなどの影響が出ています。オバマ大統領は論争やゲームの時間は過ぎ、今は行動するべき時だとして、民主・共和両党がともに最良の改革案を生み出す必要性を強調しました。
また、論議の焦点が公的保険制度であるものの、失業に伴い医療保険を失った国民の問題もあると指摘しました。そしてまた、高齢者などに治療を提供するか決定する「死の委員会」が設置される、不法移民も保険対象とするといった改革反対派の主張を全面否定。中絶費用が公的資金から支払われるようになるとの説も誤解だと釈明しました。
===
私が興味深く感じたのは演説の次の部分です。何事も「無償で」バラ色のいいことずくめになる筈がありません。必ずそれに伴う費用が発生します。それについてオバマ大統領はこう述べています。
Now, add it all up, and the plan I’m proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years — less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans that Congress passed at the beginning of the previous administration.
「私の提案する計画は10年で90兆円の費用がかります。しかしその金額はイラク、アフガニスタン戦争で費やしたコスト、あるいは前(ブッシュ)政権で富裕層への減税で使った費用よりも少ないものです。
国民の数千万人もが医療保険に加入していない(出来ていない)という恐るべき現状から脱却するためのオバマ大統領の決意から、今後も目が離せません。
Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, and the American people:
When I spoke here last winter, this nation was facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. We were losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month. Credit was frozen. And our financial system was on the verge of collapse.
As any American who is still looking for work or a way to pay their bills will tell you, we are by no means out of the woods. A full and vibrant recovery is still many months away. And I will not let up until those Americans who seek jobs can find them — (applause) — until those businesses that seek capital and credit can thrive; until all responsible homeowners can stay in their homes. That is our ultimate goal. But thanks to the bold and decisive action we’ve taken since January, I can stand here with confidence and say that we have pulled this economy back from the brink. (Applause.)
I want to thank the members of this body for your efforts and your support in these last several months, and especially those who’ve taken the difficult votes that have put us on a path to recovery. I also want to thank the American people for their patience and resolve during this trying time for our nation.
But we did not come here just to clean up crises. We came here to build a future. (Applause.) So tonight, I return to speak to all of you about an issue that is central to that future — and that is the issue of health care.
I am not the first President to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last. (Applause.) It has now been nearly a century since Theodore Roosevelt first called for health care reform. And ever since, nearly every President and Congress, whether Democrat or Republican, has attempted to meet this challenge in some way. A bill for comprehensive health reform was first introduced by John Dingell Sr. in 1943. Sixty-five years later, his son continues to introduce that same bill at the beginning of each session. (Applause.)
Our collective failure to meet this challenge — year after year, decade after decade — has led us to the breaking point. Everyone understands the extraordinary hardships that are placed on the uninsured, who live every day just one accident or illness away from bankruptcy. These are not primarily people on welfare. These are middle-class Americans. Some can’t get insurance on the job. Others are self-employed, and can’t afford it, since buying insurance on your own costs you three times as much as the coverage you get from your employer. Many other Americans who are willing and able to pay are still denied insurance due to previous illnesses or conditions that insurance companies decide are too risky or too expensive to cover.
We are the only democracy — the only advanced democracy on Earth — the only wealthy nation — that allows such hardship for millions of its people. There are now more than 30 million American citizens who cannot get coverage. In just a two-year period, one in every three Americans goes without health care coverage at some point. And every day, 14,000 Americans lose their coverage. In other words, it can happen to anyone.
But the problem that plagues the health care system is not just a problem for the uninsured. Those who do have insurance have never had less security and stability than they do today. More and more Americans worry that if you move, lose your job, or change your job, you’ll lose your health insurance too. More and more Americans pay their premiums, only to discover that their insurance company has dropped their coverage when they get sick, or won’t pay the full cost of care. It happens every day.
One man from Illinois lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found that he hadn’t reported gallstones that he didn’t even know about. They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it. Another woman from Texas was about to get a double mastectomy when her insurance company canceled her policy because she forgot to declare a case of acne. By the time she had her insurance reinstated, her breast cancer had more than doubled in size. That is heart-breaking, it is wrong, and no one should be treated that way in the United States of America. (Applause.)
Then there’s the problem of rising cost. We spend one and a half times more per person on health care than any other country, but we aren’t any healthier for it. This is one of the reasons that insurance premiums have gone up three times faster than wages. It’s why so many employers — especially small businesses — are forcing their employees to pay more for insurance, or are dropping their coverage entirely. It’s why so many aspiring entrepreneurs cannot afford to open a business in the first place, and why American businesses that compete internationally — like our automakers — are at a huge disadvantage. And it’s why those of us with health insurance are also paying a hidden and growing tax for those without it — about $1,000 per year that pays for somebody else’s emergency room and charitable care.
Finally, our health care system is placing an unsustainable burden on taxpayers. When health care costs grow at the rate they have, it puts greater pressure on programs like Medicare and Medicaid. If we do nothing to slow these skyrocketing costs, we will eventually be spending more on Medicare and Medicaid than every other government program combined. Put simply, our health care problem is our deficit problem. Nothing else even comes close. Nothing else. (Applause.)
Now, these are the facts. Nobody disputes them. We know we must reform this system. The question is how.
There are those on the left who believe that the only way to fix the system is through a single-payer system like Canada’s — (applause) — where we would severely restrict the private insurance market and have the government provide coverage for everybody. On the right, there are those who argue that we should end employer-based systems and leave individuals to buy health insurance on their own.
I’ve said — I have to say that there are arguments to be made for both these approaches. But either one would represent a radical shift that would disrupt the health care most people currently have. Since health care represents one-sixth of our economy, I believe it makes more sense to build on what works and fix what doesn’t, rather than try to build an entirely new system from scratch. (Applause.) And that is precisely what those of you in Congress have tried to do over the past several months.
During that time, we’ve seen Washington at its best and at its worst.
We’ve seen many in this chamber work tirelessly for the better part of this year to offer thoughtful ideas about how to achieve reform. Of the five committees asked to develop bills, four have completed their work, and the Senate Finance Committee announced today that it will move forward next week. That has never happened before. Our overall efforts have been supported by an unprecedented coalition of doctors and nurses; hospitals, seniors’ groups, and even drug companies — many of whom opposed reform in the past. And there is agreement in this chamber on about 80 percent of what needs to be done, putting us closer to the goal of reform than we have ever been.
But what we’ve also seen in these last months is the same partisan spectacle that only hardens the disdain many Americans have towards their own government. Instead of honest debate, we’ve seen scare tactics. Some have dug into unyielding ideological camps that offer no hope of compromise. Too many have used this as an opportunity to score short-term political points, even if it robs the country of our opportunity to solve a long-term challenge. And out of this blizzard of charges and counter-charges, confusion has reigned.
Well, the time for bickering is over. The time for games has passed. (Applause.) Now is the season for action. Now is when we must bring the best ideas of both parties together, and show the American people that we can still do what we were sent here to do. Now is the time to deliver on health care. Now is the time to deliver on health care.
The plan I’m announcing tonight would meet three basic goals. It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance. It will provide insurance for those who don’t. And it will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government. (Applause.) It’s a plan that asks everyone to take responsibility for meeting this challenge — not just government, not just insurance companies, but everybody including employers and individuals. And it’s a plan that incorporates ideas from senators and congressmen, from Democrats and Republicans — and yes, from some of my opponents in both the primary and general election.
Here are the details that every American needs to know about this plan. First, if you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, or Medicare, or Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have. (Applause.) Let me repeat this: Nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have.
What this plan will do is make the insurance you have work better for you. Under this plan, it will be against the law for insurance companies to deny you coverage because of a preexisting condition. (Applause.) As soon as I sign this bill, it will be against the law for insurance companies to drop your coverage when you get sick or water it down when you need it the most. (Applause.) They will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or in a lifetime. (Applause.) We will place a limit on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they get sick. (Applause.) And insurance companies will be required to cover, with no extra charge, routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms and colonoscopies — (applause) — because there’s no reason we shouldn’t be catching diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer before they get worse. That makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives. (Applause.)
Now, that’s what Americans who have health insurance can expect from this plan — more security and more stability.
Now, if you’re one of the tens of millions of Americans who don’t currently have health insurance, the second part of this plan will finally offer you quality, affordable choices. (Applause.) If you lose your job or you change your job, you’ll be able to get coverage. If you strike out on your own and start a small business, you’ll be able to get coverage. We’ll do this by creating a new insurance exchange — a marketplace where individuals and small businesses will be able to shop for health insurance at competitive prices. Insurance companies will have an incentive to participate in this exchange because it lets them compete for millions of new customers. As one big group, these customers will have greater leverage to bargain with the insurance companies for better prices and quality coverage. This is how large companies and government employees get affordable insurance. It’s how everyone in this Congress gets affordable insurance. And it’s time to give every American the same opportunity that we give ourselves. (Applause.)
Now, for those individuals and small businesses who still can’t afford the lower-priced insurance available in the exchange, we’ll provide tax credits, the size of which will be based on your need. And all insurance companies that want access to this new marketplace will have to abide by the consumer protections I already mentioned. This exchange will take effect in four years, which will give us time to do it right. In the meantime, for those Americans who can’t get insurance today because they have preexisting medical conditions, we will immediately offer low-cost coverage that will protect you against financial ruin if you become seriously ill. (Applause.) This was a good idea when Senator John McCain proposed it in the campaign, it’s a good idea now, and we should all embrace it. (Applause.)
Now, even if we provide these affordable options, there may be those — especially the young and the healthy — who still want to take the risk and go without coverage. There may still be companies that refuse to do right by their workers by giving them coverage. The problem is, such irresponsible behavior costs all the rest of us money. If there are affordable options and people still don’t sign up for health insurance, it means we pay for these people’s expensive emergency room visits. If some businesses don’t provide workers health care, it forces the rest of us to pick up the tab when their workers get sick, and gives those businesses an unfair advantage over their competitors. And unless everybody does their part, many of the insurance reforms we seek — especially requiring insurance companies to cover preexisting conditions — just can’t be achieved.
And that’s why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance — just as most states require you to carry auto insurance. (Applause.) Likewise — likewise, businesses will be required to either offer their workers health care, or chip in to help cover the cost of their workers. There will be a hardship waiver for those individuals who still can’t afford coverage, and 95 percent of all small businesses, because of their size and narrow profit margin, would be exempt from these requirements. (Applause.) But we can’t have large businesses and individuals who can afford coverage game the system by avoiding responsibility to themselves or their employees. Improving our health care system only works if everybody does their part.
And while there remain some significant details to be ironed out, I believe — (laughter) — I believe a broad consensus exists for the aspects of the plan I just outlined: consumer protections for those with insurance, an exchange that allows individuals and small businesses to purchase affordable coverage, and a requirement that people who can afford insurance get insurance.
And I have no doubt that these reforms would greatly benefit Americans from all walks of life, as well as the economy as a whole. Still, given all the misinformation that’s been spread over the past few months, I realize — (applause) — I realize that many Americans have grown nervous about reform. So tonight I want to address some of the key controversies that are still out there.
Some of people’s concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost. The best example is the claim made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but by prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Now, such a charge would be laughable if it weren’t so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple. (Applause.)
There are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false. The reforms — the reforms I’m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: You lie! (Boos.)
THE PRESIDENT: It’s not true. And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up — under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place. (Applause.)
Now, my health care proposal has also been attacked by some who oppose reform as a “government takeover” of the entire health care system. As proof, critics point to a provision in our plan that allows the uninsured and small businesses to choose a publicly sponsored insurance option, administered by the government just like Medicaid or Medicare. (Applause.)
So let me set the record straight here. My guiding principle is, and always has been, that consumers do better when there is choice and competition. That’s how the market works. (Applause.) Unfortunately, in 34 states, 75 percent of the insurance market is controlled by five or fewer companies. In Alabama, almost 90 percent is controlled by just one company. And without competition, the price of insurance goes up and quality goes down. And it makes it easier for insurance companies to treat their customers badly — by cherry-picking the healthiest individuals and trying to drop the sickest, by overcharging small businesses who have no leverage, and by jacking up rates.
Insurance executives don’t do this because they’re bad people; they do it because it’s profitable. As one former insurance executive testified before Congress, insurance companies are not only encouraged to find reasons to drop the seriously ill, they are rewarded for it. All of this is in service of meeting what this former executive called “Wall Street’s relentless profit expectations.”
Now, I have no interest in putting insurance companies out of business. They provide a legitimate service, and employ a lot of our friends and neighbors. I just want to hold them accountable. (Applause.) And the insurance reforms that I’ve already mentioned would do just that. But an additional step we can take to keep insurance companies honest is by making a not-for-profit public option available in the insurance exchange. (Applause.) Now, let me be clear. Let me be clear. It would only be an option for those who don’t have insurance. No one would be forced to choose it, and it would not impact those of you who already have insurance. In fact, based on Congressional Budget Office estimates, we believe that less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up.
Despite all this, the insurance companies and their allies don’t like this idea. They argue that these private companies can’t fairly compete with the government. And they’d be right if taxpayers were subsidizing this public insurance option. But they won’t be. I’ve insisted that like any private insurance company, the public insurance option would have to be self-sufficient and rely on the premiums it collects. But by avoiding some of the overhead that gets eaten up at private companies by profits and excessive administrative costs and executive salaries, it could provide a good deal for consumers, and would also keep pressure on private insurers to keep their policies affordable and treat their customers better, the same way public colleges and universities provide additional choice and competition to students without in any way inhibiting a vibrant system of private colleges and universities. (Applause.)
Now, it is — it’s worth noting that a strong majority of Americans still favor a public insurance option of the sort I’ve proposed tonight. But its impact shouldn’t be exaggerated — by the left or the right or the media. It is only one part of my plan, and shouldn’t be used as a handy excuse for the usual Washington ideological battles. To my progressive friends, I would remind you that for decades, the driving idea behind reform has been to end insurance company abuses and make coverage available for those without it. (Applause.) The public option — the public option is only a means to that end — and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal. And to my Republican friends, I say that rather than making wild claims about a government takeover of health care, we should work together to address any legitimate concerns you may have. (Applause.)
For example — for example, some have suggested that the public option go into effect only in those markets where insurance companies are not providing affordable policies. Others have proposed a co-op or another non-profit entity to administer the plan. These are all constructive ideas worth exploring. But I will not back down on the basic principle that if Americans can’t find affordable coverage, we will provide you with a choice. (Applause.) And I will make sure that no government bureaucrat or insurance company bureaucrat gets between you and the care that you need. (Applause.)
Finally, let me discuss an issue that is a great concern to me, to members of this chamber, and to the public — and that’s how we pay for this plan.
And here’s what you need to know. First, I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits — either now or in the future. (Applause.) I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period. And to prove that I’m serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don’t materialize. (Applause.) Now, part of the reason I faced a trillion-dollar deficit when I walked in the door of the White House is because too many initiatives over the last decade were not paid for — from the Iraq war to tax breaks for the wealthy. (Applause.) I will not make that same mistake with health care.
Second, we’ve estimated that most of this plan can be paid for by finding savings within the existing health care system, a system that is currently full of waste and abuse. Right now, too much of the hard-earned savings and tax dollars we spend on health care don’t make us any healthier. That’s not my judgment — it’s the judgment of medical professionals across this country. And this is also true when it comes to Medicare and Medicaid.
In fact, I want to speak directly to seniors for a moment, because Medicare is another issue that’s been subjected to demagoguery and distortion during the course of this debate.
More than four decades ago, this nation stood up for the principle that after a lifetime of hard work, our seniors should not be left to struggle with a pile of medical bills in their later years. That’s how Medicare was born. And it remains a sacred trust that must be passed down from one generation to the next. (Applause.) And that is why not a dollar of the Medicare trust fund will be used to pay for this plan. (Applause.)
The only thing this plan would eliminate is the hundreds of billions of dollars in waste and fraud, as well as unwarranted subsidies in Medicare that go to insurance companies — subsidies that do everything to pad their profits but don’t improve the care of seniors. And we will also create an independent commission of doctors and medical experts charged with identifying more waste in the years ahead. (Applause.)
Now, these steps will ensure that you — America’s seniors — get the benefits you’ve been promised. They will ensure that Medicare is there for future generations. And we can use some of the savings to fill the gap in coverage that forces too many seniors to pay thousands of dollars a year out of their own pockets for prescription drugs. (Applause.) That’s what this plan will do for you. So don’t pay attention to those scary stories about how your benefits will be cut, especially since some of the same folks who are spreading these tall tales have fought against Medicare in the past and just this year supported a budget that would essentially have turned Medicare into a privatized voucher program. That will not happen on my watch. I will protect Medicare. (Applause.)
Now, because Medicare is such a big part of the health care system, making the program more efficient can help usher in changes in the way we deliver health care that can reduce costs for everybody. We have long known that some places — like the Intermountain Healthcare in Utah or the Geisinger Health System in rural Pennsylvania — offer high-quality care at costs below average. So the commission can help encourage the adoption of these common-sense best practices by doctors and medical professionals throughout the system — everything from reducing hospital infection rates to encouraging better coordination between teams of doctors.
Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will pay for most of this plan. (Applause.) Now, much of the rest would be paid for with revenues from the very same drug and insurance companies that stand to benefit from tens of millions of new customers. And this reform will charge insurance companies a fee for their most expensive policies, which will encourage them to provide greater value for the money — an idea which has the support of Democratic and Republican experts. And according to these same experts, this modest change could help hold down the cost of health care for all of us in the long run.
Now, finally, many in this chamber — particularly on the Republican side of the aisle — have long insisted that reforming our medical malpractice laws can help bring down the cost of health care. (Applause.) Now — there you go. There you go. Now, I don’t believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I’ve talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs. (Applause.) So I’m proposing that we move forward on a range of ideas about how to put patient safety first and let doctors focus on practicing medicine. (Applause.) I know that the Bush administration considered authorizing demonstration projects in individual states to test these ideas. I think it’s a good idea, and I’m directing my Secretary of Health and Human Services to move forward on this initiative today. (Applause.)
Now, add it all up, and the plan I’m proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years — less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans that Congress passed at the beginning of the previous administration. (Applause.) Now, most of these costs will be paid for with money already being spent — but spent badly — in the existing health care system. The plan will not add to our deficit. The middle class will realize greater security, not higher taxes. And if we are able to slow the growth of health care costs by just one-tenth of 1 percent each year — one-tenth of 1 percent — it will actually reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the long term.
Now, this is the plan I’m proposing. It’s a plan that incorporates ideas from many of the people in this room tonight — Democrats and Republicans. And I will continue to seek common ground in the weeks ahead. If you come to me with a serious set of proposals, I will be there to listen. My door is always open.
But know this: I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it’s better politics to kill this plan than to improve it. (Applause.) I won’t stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are. If you misrepresent what’s in this plan, we will call you out. (Applause.) And I will not — and I will not accept the status quo as a solution. Not this time. Not now.
Everyone in this room knows what will happen if we do nothing. Our deficit will grow. More families will go bankrupt. More businesses will close. More Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick and need it the most. And more will die as a result. We know these things to be true.
That is why we cannot fail. Because there are too many Americans counting on us to succeed — the ones who suffer silently, and the ones who shared their stories with us at town halls, in e-mails, and in letters.
I received one of those letters a few days ago. It was from our beloved friend and colleague, Ted Kennedy. He had written it back in May, shortly after he was told that his illness was terminal. He asked that it be delivered upon his death.
In it, he spoke about what a happy time his last months were, thanks to the love and support of family and friends, his wife, Vicki, his amazing children, who are all here tonight. And he expressed confidence that this would be the year that health care reform — “that great unfinished business of our society,” he called it — would finally pass. He repeated the truth that health care is decisive for our future prosperity, but he also reminded me that “it concerns more than material things.” “What we face,” he wrote, “is above all a moral issue; at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country.”
I’ve thought about that phrase quite a bit in recent days — the character of our country. One of the unique and wonderful things about America has always been our self-reliance, our rugged individualism, our fierce defense of freedom and our healthy skepticism of government. And figuring out the appropriate size and role of government has always been a source of rigorous and, yes, sometimes angry debate. That’s our history.
For some of Ted Kennedy’s critics, his brand of liberalism represented an affront to American liberty. In their minds, his passion for universal health care was nothing more than a passion for big government.
But those of us who knew Teddy and worked with him here — people of both parties — know that what drove him was something more. His friend Orrin Hatch — he knows that. They worked together to provide children with health insurance. His friend John McCain knows that. They worked together on a Patient’s Bill of Rights. His friend Chuck Grassley knows that. They worked together to provide health care to children with disabilities.
On issues like these, Ted Kennedy’s passion was born not of some rigid ideology, but of his own experience. It was the experience of having two children stricken with cancer. He never forgot the sheer terror and helplessness that any parent feels when a child is badly sick. And he was able to imagine what it must be like for those without insurance, what it would be like to have to say to a wife or a child or an aging parent, there is something that could make you better, but I just can’t afford it.
That large-heartedness — that concern and regard for the plight of others — is not a partisan feeling. It’s not a Republican or a Democratic feeling. It, too, is part of the American character — our ability to stand in other people’s shoes; a recognition that we are all in this together, and when fortune turns against one of us, others are there to lend a helping hand; a belief that in this country, hard work and responsibility should be rewarded by some measure of security and fair play; and an acknowledgment that sometimes government has to step in to help deliver on that promise.
This has always been the history of our progress. In 1935, when over half of our seniors could not support themselves and millions had seen their savings wiped away, there were those who argued that Social Security would lead to socialism, but the men and women of Congress stood fast, and we are all the better for it. In 1965, when some argued that Medicare represented a government takeover of health care, members of Congress — Democrats and Republicans — did not back down. They joined together so that all of us could enter our golden years with some basic peace of mind.
You see, our predecessors understood that government could not, and should not, solve every problem. They understood that there are instances when the gains in security from government action are not worth the added constraints on our freedom. But they also understood that the danger of too much government is matched by the perils of too little; that without the leavening hand of wise policy, markets can crash, monopolies can stifle competition, the vulnerable can be exploited. And they knew that when any government measure, no matter how carefully crafted or beneficial, is subject to scorn; when any efforts to help people in need are attacked as un-American; when facts and reason are thrown overboard and only timidity passes for wisdom, and we can no longer even engage in a civil conversation with each other over the things that truly matter — that at that point we don’t merely lose our capacity to solve big challenges. We lose something essential about ourselves.
That was true then. It remains true today. I understand how difficult this health care debate has been. I know that many in this country are deeply skeptical that government is looking out for them. I understand that the politically safe move would be to kick the can further down the road — to defer reform one more year, or one more election, or one more term.
But that is not what the moment calls for. That’s not what we came here to do. We did not come to fear the future. We came here to shape it. I still believe we can act even when it’s hard. (Applause.) I still believe — I still believe that we can act when it’s hard. I still believe we can replace acrimony with civility, and gridlock with progress. I still believe we can do great things, and that here and now we will meet history’s test.
Because that’s who we are. That is our calling. That is our character. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)